Go Search!
 
 



Release Date: Aug. 7, 2003

PRE-NATAL PROGRAMS FALL SHORT
ON SMOKING CESSATION

By Aaron Levin, Staff Writer
Health Behavior News Service


Administrators of three out of four prenatal programs for low-income women admit they aren’t doing enough to help pregnant women quit or reduce their smoking, a new study shows.

This provides a discouraging view of the smoking-cessation activities of the agencies that serve pregnant women, says Lorraine Klerman, Dr.P.H, of Brandeis University. Agency staff members believe that pregnant women have more important problems than smoking. They feel that it is difficult if not impossible to convince pregnant women to stop smoking, and lack materials to help them do so.

In a study appearing in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Klerman and Crystal Spivey, Dr.P.H, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham surveyed 354 public and quasi-public organizations that offered prenatal care, especially to low-income women.

According to the U.S. Public Health Service, women who smoke are likely to have more stillbirths, spontaneous abortions, and premature babies compared to non-smokers. Their babies are also more likely to have lower birth weight, sudden infant death syndrome, cleft palate and childhood cancers. Helping women quit smoking when they’re pregnant can benefit the future health of their children.

The organizations surveyed offered care both at clinics and by visiting women in their homes. They included federally funded Healthy Start programs and a variety of maternal and child health programs run by states and cities around the United States.

Only 24 percent of the agencies thought they were doing an adequate job of getting women to stop smoking. Most of those who acknowledged they weren’t doing a good enough job cited insufficient agency funds and lack of staff time as reasons. Others said that clients had more important problems to worry about. About a third blamed a shortage of specialists to train staff.

Only a quarter of the programs offered smoking cessation classes, but most of those said it was hard to get clients in the door. They attributed this to lack of encouragement from clients' family members, lack of child care, long waiting lists and inconvenient hours or locations.

Agencies also asked for more smoking cessation materials, guidelines for proven ways to combat smoking and training at professional meetings.

Most agencies that visited pregnant women in their homes required staff to record their clients' smoking status and expected them to counsel pregnant smokers about the effects of smoking. However, less than half the agencies said they trained the home visitors in smoking reduction or cessation methods. Client problems like drug addiction or domestic violence ranked higher on these workers priority lists.

All individuals and groups serving pregnant women need to direct more effort to helping smokers quit, Klerman says. They need experts to educate staff, pregnancy-specific smoking materials, manuals of best practices and changes in agency policies

She suggests making smoking education programs part of every staff orientation program and requiring agency workers to record pre-pregnancy smoking status and inquire about other smokers in the household.

Clearly more research is needed, Klerman says, not only about how to convince pregnant women to stop smoking but also about how to convince clinicians to use methods known to be effective.

Grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services supported the research.

# # #

Health Behavior News Service: (202) 387-2829 or www.hbns.org.
Interviews: Contact Lorraine V. Klerman at (781) 736-3715 or klerman@brandeis.edu.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine: Contact the editorial office at (619) 594-7344.



Center for the Advancement of Health
Contact: Ira R. Allen
Director of Public Affairs
202.387.2829
press@cfah.org