Release Date: August 7, 2001
Contact: NHLBI press office
(301) 496-4236
Bill Schaller
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
(617) 632-8052
Certain Types of Counseling in Primary Care Settings About Physical Activity are Effective in Improving Fitness
Interventions appear effective for inactive women,
but not for men
CHICAGO - Two interventions for educating sedentary patients about physical activity
were more effective than current recommended care standards in improving female patients'
cardiorespiratory fitness, according to an article in the August 8 issue of The Journal of
the American Medical Association (JAMA). The interventions did not have any significant
effect on the cardiorespiratory fitness of men.
The Activity Counseling Trial (sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute, Bethesda, Md.) studied 395 inactive women and 479 inactive men with stable
health aged 35 to 75 years recruited from 11 primary care facilities. They were assigned
to one of three groups and counseled, between 1995 to 1997, on the benefits of physical
activity and then followed-up two years later to assess their cardiovascular fitness and
degree of physical activity.
According to background information cited in the article, physical activity is
important for health and many national healthcare organizations recommend that primary
care physicians counsel patients on physical activity. Despite the recommendations, the
authors state that "health care practitioners do not routinely counsel patients about
physical activity. ... [The] effectiveness of patient education and counseling in
primary care on physical activity and fitness has been inadequately tested."
The three groups consisted of: an advice group (n=292) which included physician advice
and written educational materials (recommended care); an assistance group (n=293) which
included the components received by the advice group plus interactive mail and behavioral
counseling at physician visits; or a counseling group (n=289) which included the
components of the advice and assistance groups plus regular telephone counseling and
behavioral classes. Cardiorespiratory fitness (measured by oxygen uptake during a
treadmill exercise test) and self-reported physical activity measurements were analyzed
before and after the intervention.
All three groups were given physical activity goals based on current national
recommendations of five or more days a week of 30 minutes of moderate-intensity physical
activity (such as brisk walking) or three or more days a week of 30 minutes of
vigorous-intensity physical activity (such as running).
At six months and 24 months, there were no appreciable differences in the self-reported
physical activity of the participants in any of the groups; however, "For women, the
assistance and the counseling interventions were similar in significantly increasing
cardiorespiratory fitness [compared to the advice group]," the authors state.
"For men, neither the assistance nor counseling intervention improved
cardiorespiratory fitness or total physical activity significantly above the level
achieved by the advice group."
"The ACT assistance and counseling interventions demonstrated discernable success
with women but not with men. It would seem advisable to use these, or similar,
interventions for inactive women patients interested in increasing their physical
activity, while delivering physician advice and educational materials to men, which is the
current recommended care," the authors conclude.
(JAMA. 2001; 286:677-687; available post-embargo at jama.com)
Editors Note: This research was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and
Blood Institute. For the financial disclosure of principal investigator Steven Blair,
please see the JAMA article.
EDITORIAL: THE CHALLENGE OF INFLUENCING BEHAVIORAL CHANGE
In an accompanying editorial, Christina C. Wee, M.D., M.P.H., of Beth Israel Deaconess
Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, comments on the results of the ACT study,
stating that, "Unfortunately, the ACT does not directly address a central
question-whether physical activity counseling by clinicians in primary care settings
increases pysical activity or improves cardiorespiratory fitness levels." Dr. Wee
states that the study "... still leaves clinicians facing the dilemma of whether and
in what manner to counsel their patients regarding increasing physical activity."
Dr. Wee states that the study does address whether high-intensity counseling about
physical activity improves fitness levels when compared with more modest counseling and
that the study shows an association between physicians' engaging in intensive counseling
about physical activity and improvements in physical fitness. "Because the ACT
findings that intensive physical activity counseling improved cardiorespiratory fitness in
women compared with the provision of advice alone, skeptics may be less likely to argue
against the efficacy of high-intensity counseling, at least among women," the author
states.
"Sedentary lifestyle and low physical fitness are health risks as important as
type 2 diabetes mellitus and other conventional cardiovascular risk factors," the
author states.
"How intensive counseling efforts need to be and whether such efforts will be
cost-effective, however, remain important unanswered questions."
JAMA. 2001: 286; 717-719; available post-embargo at jama.com)
# # #
For more information: contact the JAMA/Archives Media Relations
Department at 312/464-5374.
The Center for the Advancement of Health promotes
greater understanding of the psychological, behavioral, social and environmental
determinants of health. The Center advocates the highest quality research and communicates
it to the medical community and the public.
This release is reproduced verbatim and with permission from the American
Medical Association as a service to reporters interested in health and behavioral change.
Center for the Advancement of Health
Contact: Ira R. Allen
Director of Public Affairs
(202) 387-2829
press@cfah.org