Release Date: July 4, 2001
Contact: Claire E. Balmer
+44 (0) 1202 442135
cbalmer@poole-tr.swest.nhs.uk
Patients with Advanced Cancer Willing To Accept Riskier
Chemotherapy
People with advanced cancer are more willing than healthy people or doctors to consider
a toxic chemotherapy regimen even if it offers only a minimal chance of slowing their
cancer, according to a new study.
The findings, published in the journal Psycho-Oncology, suggest that cancer
patients who have failed to respond to the most effective chemotherapy, known as
first-line treatment, and healthy people share very different views of
"worthwhile" treatment.
The researchers say the study illuminates an important consumer viewpoint that should
be considered by decision-makers and policy-makers when planning health care services and
allocating resources.
"Many people with advanced cancer seem to feel it is worthwhile undergoing
treatment, even if that treatment means reduced quality of life and the possibility of
minimal benefit," says the lead investigator, Claire E. Balmer, R.N. of the Dorset
Cancer Centre in Great Britain.
The researchers asked 92 people with cancer, 76 healthy people without cancer, 260
oncologists and palliative care physicians, 59 oncology and palliative care nurses and 58
general practitioners to consider two second-line treatment scenarios. One scenario
involved brief, intravenous treatment in an outpatient setting and the other involved a
more intensive, three-day treatment regimen that would cause more severe side effects.
The subjects were asked whether each treatment would be acceptable to them, given
stated side effects and risks. They also were asked to choose the minimum chance of
benefit and minimum duration of the benefit they would accept to make each form of
treatment worthwhile for them.
Compared to the healthy people, physicians and nurses, the cancer patients generally
were more willing to accept both the milder and riskier chemotherapy, even if the chance
of remission was low and of short duration.
"These results suggest that physicians and other health care professionals may
want to reconsider their definitions of worthwhile' when discussing treatment
options with patients," she says.
###
Psycho-Oncology is a bimonthly international journal devoted to the
psychological, social and behavioral dimensions of cancer. Published by John Wiley, it is
the official journal of the American, British and International Psycho-Oncology Societies.
Contact Jimmie Holland, M.D., Co-Editor, at (212) 739-7051 for information. For copies of
the article, contact the Center for the Advancement of Health at 202.387.2829 or e-mail
press@cfah.org
Center for the Advancement of Health
Contact: Ira R. Allen
Director of Public Affairs
202.387.2829
press@cfah.org